Bruh... 

I literally just said modern Austronesians may have been catalyzed at least strongly by a migration either relating to or from coastal northern China. This becomes very obvious when you compare the earliest southern Fujian samples like Liangdao to later ones and modern northern Austronesians (both Taiwanese aborigines and Igorots). This is also supported by rice farming spread dynamics. 

This doesn't change anything?

No one IRL really identifies as "northern" or "southern" outside of a strictly modern Chinese framework. Why the hell does it matter to an Austronesian speaker that some of their ancestors may have originated in what is now northern China? It doesn't mean they were "northern Chinese"? 

In fact, I also hate wars between the North and the South, which are usually various comparisons, discriminatory and derogatory remarks. It's just that people who uphold this kind of argument are active in various places, and I don't want these people to appear on forums I like. If, on the other hand, I say that southerners are moving north and bringing civilization to the north, is there anyone who opposes me so We need to acknowledge the differences between the north and south. If we are too farfetched and insist on East Asian reunification, it will inevitably lead to a reversal of things,You can't even be honest about differences, so I have nothing to say

Moreover, the purpose of this post was originally to introduce the local people's looks and describe the types of differences, rather than comparing them from north to south

I was asked to share this Chinese martial artist here by u/Radiant_Muffin7528. His face/head morph does exist among Lingnan Han, it's a recognizably Daic look IMO (although more divergent from the CJK mainstream than most archetypal Lingnan looks). Get a load of this 状帅哥 😤 💪🏼


youtube.com/@mykungfulife182

Also- for those of you who know what my username is a reference to, here's a group of Hong Kong weeaboos who know how to play musical instruments

Uisashi is now back at Tieba (a notorious Chinese forum full of Northern Chinese supremacists and ethnocentrists) and his username there is Yudajin111. I've been quietly following him there for quite a while and most of what he said there is nothing more than bias.

His new claim there is that Western China has a more unified look than Eastern China and that people from Henan all the way to Guangxi look exactly the same whereas Eastern China has more diverse phenotypes.

This is absolutely bullshit! Western China is definitely more diverse than Eastern China. I have many Guangxi friends and I've also met people from Henan, and I think there're obvious differences between these two groups. Most people from Henan just look like your regular or stereotypical Northern Chinese (for instance the Henan comedian Yue Yunpeng), whereas people from Guangxi no matter which ethnic group they belong to all have rather strong Daic, Austronesian, or sometimes even Austroasiatic influences.

Even Northwestern China is more diverse than Northern and Northeastern China.

Really what he says shows that he's clueless about the diversity of peoples in China.

I never said people in Guangxi look exactly the same as people in Henan df? But at times there is definitely a shared western Chinese look like this Henan guy who imo passes easier in Guangxi than in say as a Yantai native. Also eastern China imo can be very diverse. People in far eastern Jiangnan for example like Nantong look different to people in say Changzhou/Nanjing. People in Shanxi/Henan are also more broadly Chinese passing than people in say Liaoning or Yantai.

Here’re some more Guangxi people’s photos, all I deem to be rather typical for their region.